Subscribe to our newsletter
Senders' Videos
Most cold outreach problems don’t start with bad copy but with emails quietly landing in spam. You don’t notice it at first. Open rates seem fine. Replies are just a little lower than usual. Then one day, nothing lands.
By the time it’s obvious, it’s too late. The domain is flagged, your inboxes are throttled, and the campaign is dead in the water.
This guide shows you how to test email deliverability before it happens—not by guessing or sending test emails to yourself, but through real systems that catch issues early, adapt fast, and keep your outreach working at scale.
What Email Deliverability Really Means in Cold Outreach
Just because an email was “sent” doesn’t mean it was delivered; even if it was delivered, that doesn’t mean it made it to the inbox.
In cold outreach, deliverability means landing in the primary inbox of a real person who didn’t opt in. Not the promotions tab. Not spam. Not somewhere they’ll never see it. And since you’re reaching out without permission, filters treat your messages with far more suspicion than traditional marketing emails.
This is why cold email systems require stricter, smarter testing. You’re working with thinner margins, more variables, and less room for error. That means monitoring actual inbox placement, not just email status, is essential if you want campaigns to scale without silently failing.
The Wrong Way to Test Email Deliverability
Most teams run deliverability checks that feel useful but fail to reflect how inboxes actually behave under cold outreach conditions.
Are you testing by sending to your own Gmail?
This is one of the most common mistakes. Sending test emails to yourself (or your teammates) doesn’t reflect how inbox providers treat your outreach in real conditions. Filters behave differently when messages are unsolicited, sent at volume, or come from freshly warmed domains. Just because it lands in your inbox doesn’t mean it lands in your prospect’s inbox.
Is open rate your only indicator?
Open rates used to be a reliable signal, but not anymore. Apple’s Mail Privacy Protection inflates opens artificially. Some inboxes block pixel tracking completely. Others trigger opens automatically on preview. If your only metric is “opens look fine,” you won’t see deliverability issues until reply rates tank.
Why These Methods Give You False Confidence
They make it seem like everything’s working, until it isn’t. We’ve seen teams run full campaigns thinking deliverability was solid, only to discover inboxes had been landing in spam for days. Cold email systems don’t just need to be tested; they need to be validated in live conditions.
How to Test Email Deliverability — the Right Way
Superficial checks won’t catch the real issues, especially not in cold outreach. Here’s how to actually test email deliverability in a way that reflects real-world performance.
Use Inbox Placement Tools That Reflect Real Conditions
Tools like GlockApps, Mailreach, or Mail-Tester simulate sending from your actual domain to real inboxes across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, and more. These tools show:
- Which percentage of your emails land in the inbox vs. spam vs. promotions
- How consistent is your placement across providers
- Whether content, domain, or IP reputation is hurting your results
Instead of guessing, you get real data on where your emails are actually going.
Monitor Bounce, Spam, and Complaint Rates Daily
These are the signals inbox providers watch — and so should you.
Track:
- Bounce rates (especially over 2%)
- Spam complaint rates (anything above 0.1% is critical)
- Hard vs. soft bounces and what they mean
- Blacklist status (Talos, MXToolbox)
- Google Postmaster Tools' reputation grades
If any of these metrics trend in the wrong direction, deliverability is already slipping even if opens look fine.
Track Reply Trends, Not Just Opens
Cold outreach lives or dies by replies. If reply rates drop while sends stay consistent, that’s a red flag. Even small dips — over a few days — can signal inbox placement issues.
Replies are the strongest deliverability signal you control. Systems should be designed to watch for dips and react automatically, long before spam filters make the decision for you.
Building a Repeatable Testing Workflow
Testing shouldn’t be done only when something breaks. It should be baked into your system, like volume ramping, reply tracking, or campaign logic.
What to Test and When
Different sending situations require different testing cadences. For example:
- New domains → test daily until stable
- Warmed domains → 2–3 times per week
- High-volume campaigns → test by inbox pool, especially when adding new segments
Skipping tests for even a few days can mean missing early signs of a deliverability drop — and at scale, a few days is all it takes to do real damage.
Your testing loop should answer three things consistently:
Are we inboxing across major providers?
Is the domain/IP reputation holding?
Are reply trends signaling decline before volume spikes?
A reliable testing workflow is less about volume and more about visibility. It helps you stay ahead of the filters, not behind them.
How Senders Build Deliverability Monitoring into Outreach Systems
We don’t run one-off deliverability tests; we embed monitoring into the way campaigns are built, launched, and adjusted. Every outreach system is treated like a living process, not a static setup.
Let’s say a campaign shows a steady drop in replies over 48 hours. In our system, that triggers a volume slowdown, inbox placement tests across Gmail and Outlook, and alerts tied to bounce and complaint rate thresholds. No one’s scrambling to diagnose — the system is already reacting.
That’s how Senders protects scale, not with one tool or one fix, but with layered signals and feedback loops that detect friction before it becomes failure.
Most teams wait until something breaks to start thinking about deliverability. By then, the damage is already spreading — lower reply rates, inboxes hitting spam, domains quietly degrading. That’s not a strategy. That’s cleanup.
Knowing how to test email deliverability and building that testing into your cold outreach system is what separates teams that scale from teams that stall. Don’t wait for filters to make the decision for you.
Most cold outreach problems don’t start with bad copy but with emails quietly landing in spam. You don’t notice it at first. Open rates seem fine. Replies are just a little lower than usual. Then one day, nothing lands.
By the time it’s obvious, it’s too late. The domain is flagged, your inboxes are throttled, and the campaign is dead in the water.
This guide shows you how to test email deliverability before it happens—not by guessing or sending test emails to yourself, but through real systems that catch issues early, adapt fast, and keep your outreach working at scale.
What Email Deliverability Really Means in Cold Outreach
Just because an email was “sent” doesn’t mean it was delivered; even if it was delivered, that doesn’t mean it made it to the inbox.
In cold outreach, deliverability means landing in the primary inbox of a real person who didn’t opt in. Not the promotions tab. Not spam. Not somewhere they’ll never see it. And since you’re reaching out without permission, filters treat your messages with far more suspicion than traditional marketing emails.
This is why cold email systems require stricter, smarter testing. You’re working with thinner margins, more variables, and less room for error. That means monitoring actual inbox placement, not just email status, is essential if you want campaigns to scale without silently failing.
The Wrong Way to Test Email Deliverability
Most teams run deliverability checks that feel useful but fail to reflect how inboxes actually behave under cold outreach conditions.
Are you testing by sending to your own Gmail?
This is one of the most common mistakes. Sending test emails to yourself (or your teammates) doesn’t reflect how inbox providers treat your outreach in real conditions. Filters behave differently when messages are unsolicited, sent at volume, or come from freshly warmed domains. Just because it lands in your inbox doesn’t mean it lands in your prospect’s inbox.
Is open rate your only indicator?
Open rates used to be a reliable signal, but not anymore. Apple’s Mail Privacy Protection inflates opens artificially. Some inboxes block pixel tracking completely. Others trigger opens automatically on preview. If your only metric is “opens look fine,” you won’t see deliverability issues until reply rates tank.
Why These Methods Give You False Confidence
They make it seem like everything’s working, until it isn’t. We’ve seen teams run full campaigns thinking deliverability was solid, only to discover inboxes had been landing in spam for days. Cold email systems don’t just need to be tested; they need to be validated in live conditions.
How to Test Email Deliverability — the Right Way
Superficial checks won’t catch the real issues, especially not in cold outreach. Here’s how to actually test email deliverability in a way that reflects real-world performance.
Use Inbox Placement Tools That Reflect Real Conditions
Tools like GlockApps, Mailreach, or Mail-Tester simulate sending from your actual domain to real inboxes across Gmail, Outlook, Yahoo, and more. These tools show:
- Which percentage of your emails land in the inbox vs. spam vs. promotions
- How consistent is your placement across providers
- Whether content, domain, or IP reputation is hurting your results
Instead of guessing, you get real data on where your emails are actually going.
Monitor Bounce, Spam, and Complaint Rates Daily
These are the signals inbox providers watch — and so should you.
Track:
- Bounce rates (especially over 2%)
- Spam complaint rates (anything above 0.1% is critical)
- Hard vs. soft bounces and what they mean
- Blacklist status (Talos, MXToolbox)
- Google Postmaster Tools' reputation grades
If any of these metrics trend in the wrong direction, deliverability is already slipping even if opens look fine.
Track Reply Trends, Not Just Opens
Cold outreach lives or dies by replies. If reply rates drop while sends stay consistent, that’s a red flag. Even small dips — over a few days — can signal inbox placement issues.
Replies are the strongest deliverability signal you control. Systems should be designed to watch for dips and react automatically, long before spam filters make the decision for you.
Building a Repeatable Testing Workflow
Testing shouldn’t be done only when something breaks. It should be baked into your system, like volume ramping, reply tracking, or campaign logic.
What to Test and When
Different sending situations require different testing cadences. For example:
- New domains → test daily until stable
- Warmed domains → 2–3 times per week
- High-volume campaigns → test by inbox pool, especially when adding new segments
Skipping tests for even a few days can mean missing early signs of a deliverability drop — and at scale, a few days is all it takes to do real damage.
Your testing loop should answer three things consistently:
Are we inboxing across major providers?
Is the domain/IP reputation holding?
Are reply trends signaling decline before volume spikes?
A reliable testing workflow is less about volume and more about visibility. It helps you stay ahead of the filters, not behind them.
How Senders Build Deliverability Monitoring into Outreach Systems
We don’t run one-off deliverability tests; we embed monitoring into the way campaigns are built, launched, and adjusted. Every outreach system is treated like a living process, not a static setup.
Let’s say a campaign shows a steady drop in replies over 48 hours. In our system, that triggers a volume slowdown, inbox placement tests across Gmail and Outlook, and alerts tied to bounce and complaint rate thresholds. No one’s scrambling to diagnose — the system is already reacting.
That’s how Senders protects scale, not with one tool or one fix, but with layered signals and feedback loops that detect friction before it becomes failure.
Most teams wait until something breaks to start thinking about deliverability. By then, the damage is already spreading — lower reply rates, inboxes hitting spam, domains quietly degrading. That’s not a strategy. That’s cleanup.
Knowing how to test email deliverability and building that testing into your cold outreach system is what separates teams that scale from teams that stall. Don’t wait for filters to make the decision for you.
